“He exploits and commodifies women”, Focus evangelical


The Spanish Evangelical Alliance (AEE) Bioethics Working Group has published a paper analyzing the issue of surrogacy.

The text, the first in the Spanish evangelical sphere to address this specific question, is structured in different sections that present a definition of this practice and a reflection from several points of view, such as theological, social or ethical, and ends with proposals for the near future.

The AEE justifies its publication by the importance that surrogacy has acquired in the social and political debate in recent years, but also by the absence of specific legal regulations of this practice, which is prohibited in Spain but allows babies born through surrogacy in other countries to be registered in the civil registry.

The evangelical entity explains that the European Court of Human Rights has always ruled “not on the validity or not of the contract, but in relation to the effects of parentage derivative of a technique practiced in a country which admits it, by citizens of another country which prohibits it”.

In its document, the EEA maintains that “this practice must not be authorized or legalized“; he asks that it be considered as”medical, physical and psychological violence against women“; and demands that” any activity linked to intermediation which facilitates access to these practices in third countries be prohibited in Spain “.

He also asks that “the children registrationn designed by GPA outside Spain should not be allowed”.

In addition, he asserts “that national adoption must be a priority on the legitimate desire to have children, and as an alternative to child abandonment and the large number of abortions that are registered in the country ”.

For the AEE, “many aspects of surrogacy are of concern from an ethical and moral point of view and attacks human rights, and more particularly those women and children”.

He speaks of “commodification of the human body”, both of the woman and of the baby, and also of an attack on “the freedom of the woman, since in most cases they are forced to sell their body to survive economically ”.

“There are situations of poverty and great vulnerability that the free market exploits, so the State must protect fundamental rights and guarantee the protection of the weakest”, denounces the EEA.

They also specify that this practice “facilitates the exploitation of women because the procedure itself leads to situations of vulnerability for the woman and the baby who lead to human trafficking and reproductive slavery”.

Moreover, he violates children’s right to identity“, Who” will not be able to know who their mother or their genetic father is, nor will they be able to know who their surrogate mother is. “

“Some people may argue that surrogacy is similar to organ donation, but that argument is not true. The gift is an attempt to reconstitute the natural order of things, whereas with surrogacy this natural order is intrinsically altered “, specifies the AEE.

In its paper, the Alliance asks whether surrogacy is a business rather than a reproductive right, and argues that instead of a ‘right’, ‘we should be talking about a’ desire »To have children, or rather to a privilege that only a few with purchasing power can enjoy, to the detriment of the vulnerability of surrogate mothers ”.

“This procedure reveals a great contradiction, because on the one hand, a woman or a man is considered fulfilled when he can fulfill the desire to be a mother or a father, but for this to be true there must be another. woman who alienates herself by immediately abandoning the newborn ”, specifies the AEE.

According to the evangelical entity, “in the fulfillment of this desire, there is people who make this desire their business. The agencies that act as middlemen do it for profit and are the ones that make the most profit, because it is a very lucrative market ”.

The EEA distinguishes between the social arguments for and against surrogacy. The first are those who “understand motherhood as a right”, speak of the “dream” of being parents and advocate the freedom “to do what they want with their body”.

The latter denounce “surrogacy as an exploitation of the body of women, reducing them to simple vessels”, and speak of the absence of the right of the baby born from this practice to “know his parentage”.

The document identifies Biblical precedents for “surrogacy‘, for example, Sarah and Hagar (Genesis 16: 4-5) or Jacob, Rachel and Leah (Genesis 29: 31-30: 3), and points out that’it is not fair according to God nor his will “.

They recall that in the Bible, “there are normative texts of the will of God and descriptive texts of the reality of the fallen human being. Polygamy, slavery and surrogacy are not the will of God ”.

“There are another alternative in the Bible that responds to the desire for motherhood and fatherhood, and at the same time to the need of a family for the children who do not have one, and that is adoption, as in the case of Moses ”, underlines the AEE.

They point out that “adoption reminds us that we have been adopted by God, who becomes our Father. Through this adoption, we are already enjoying our Father’s benevolent love on earth and eagerly awaiting the inheritance prepared for us in heaven ”.

“Adoption becomes a precious metaphor for all those who have accepted the offer to become children of God” concludes the AEE.

You can read the full document here (in Spanish).

Posted in: Evangelical focus – europe
– Spanish Evangelical Alliance on Surrogacy: “It exploits and commodifies women”

Source link


Leave A Reply